Kildonan

Kildonan, where sheep were worth more than people

We recently had a holiday; camping near Dundonnell among sheep and midgies. We stayed on a wee croft. One of many which stretch along the shoreline of Little Loch Broom, wee strips of land 3 acres in size. Looking on the map of the area I saw a set of ruins, marked as a sheep station. Curiosity got the better of me so I jumped on my bike and set off to have a look. The gate at the track head was locked, the land owner was clearly not trying to encourage folk to enjoy the countryside hereabouts. But I still managed to get over to the ruins, which I now know to be called Kildonan.

Kildonan was a township, a community of people who lived on and worked the land. Not an easy life in the highlands of Scotland. But what greeted me there were sad little piles of stone, each one a monument to the greed of men. A few of the piles were still recognisable as black hooses, turf roofed buildings with no chimney, but most of them looked as if the walls had been pushed in, an effort to hide the embarrassment of the land owners perhaps. A lot of the stone had been robbed to build folds for the sheep which replaced the people. But each one of those piles cried to me, wanting to tell me of the sadness of their history.

The people of Kildonan were subsisting, but surviving. They had no money but paid their rents in kind to the laird, with goods and labour. The land changed hands a number of times and eventually ended up in the possession of Mackenzie of Ardross. He wanted to make “improvements” to the land, so he used an ancient act of parliament which allowed him to evict the tenants with 40 days notice. You see, one man and a dog could earn the laird ten times as much looking after Cheviot sheep as all of the people could earn him. The people had improved the land over generations, collecting kelp from the shore and spreading it on the peaty soil. But now the laird coveted this more fertile ground for sheep.

So the people of Kildonan were evicted, along with the inhabitants of the township of Keppoch. About 128 people of all ages were pushed up the Scoraig peninsula to farm tiny 3 acre strips of peat bog, an area which was not large enough to live off. They had no shelter and whole families had to sleep in the heather until some rudimentary dwelling could be constructed upon their allocated strip of bog. The sheep now grazed their former land. Some of the people were being evicted for the second time, having been cleared from Strathnasealg a few years before. Still the people had to pay their rents by working for the laird up to 21 days a year, normally the best days for getting the work done.

Kildonan Ruin

Kildonan Ruin

What might have been for Kildonan had it not been cleared? It could have been a town by now. But the greed of the laird, spun as improvements, ruined the township and the people but made him rich for a time until the price of sheep collapsed. Now Kildonan lies on the 33000 acre Dundonnel Estate which used to be owned by the composer Tim Rice. He would come and play on the estate for 2 weeks a year, the remainder of the time he was an absentee landlord.  Keppoch is shrouded in trees, as if the shame is too acute to allow it to be seen.

All of this highlights the problems of land ownership in Scotland today. At least the crofters have security of tenure these days but the are still at the mercy of feudal overlords who control vast swathes of our land. These owners manage the land for blood sports, the Eilean Darach estate also own 6500 acres in this area, you can stay there and kill lots of fish, birds and animals from as little as £4200 per week. Where there should be natural forest there is scorched strips of heather. Where eagles should be soaring there is poisoned bait and the blast of shotguns.

Is this what we want for our land? For it to be a playground for the rich? For it to be owned by, and for the benefit of, a handful of people?

I would like to see these places repopulated. The natural pine forests restored. The native wildlife given the conditions which they need to thrive. That’s what I want for our land.

 

 

Ultimo

Stop Moneing

Wonderful news that Scotland’s most famous underwear entrepreneur is to be ennobled by David Cameron. Her elevation really shows off the best of the British establishment. The one where political party donors, failed politicians and other favoured cronies get to swill taxpayers’ bubbly and relax on some red leather benches and get paid £300 per day for doing so. They also get to amend and block legislation, but that’s a side issue.

Ms Mone, who admits to falsifying qualifications on her CV to get a job (isn’t that illegal?), is the original flip-flop woman. She is like a spoilt child who issues threats to leave as soon as something displeases her. She used to support the Labour party (the old cluncker Gordie Broon bunged her an OBE for her efforts) until she realised that they were about to lose the 2010 election so she switched her support to the Tories. Labour increasing the top rate of income tax may have had something to do with it as well, she even threatened to leave the UK if Labour pursued the policy (which they did but she didn’t).

Once Conservatism had filled her soul she was addressing the cabinet and came out for the Union during the independence campaign. She threatened to leave again if Scotland voted Yes, this time to England (which we didn’t but she did anyway). Her support for the Better Together campaign is now to be recognised and she is so worth it. After all, Lord Sewell looked a right tube with that hooker’s bra on. Surely she can design a nice, masculine bra which would lift and separate a lord’s moobs. Perhaps it could have a handy coke pocket too?

Of course once she enters the lords she may get to be part of the government, perhaps as a minister, even though nobody ever voted for her. She will sit alongside 800 odd other unelected people and amend our laws. How’s that for democracy?

Carpet-bombing

Acting under oath

“I… swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will, as in duty bound, honestly and faithfully defend Her Majesty, Her Heirs and Successors, in Person, Crown and Dignity against all enemies, and will observe and obey all orders of Her Majesty, Her Heirs and Successors, and of the generals (air officers) and officers set over me.”

This is the Oath of Allegiance which is sworn by all members of the British Army and Royal Air Force. What this means is that all persons who have sworn this oath will do as they are legally ordered to do. So if, let’s say, Air Commodore DG Cooper ordered an RAF pilot to go on an exchange posting with the US, French or Canadian armed forces. Then the person who had sworn this oath would be duty bound to follow that order. Whatever that entailed.

The way that the armed forces work in this country is that, although they swear allegiance to the queen, the queen vests the strategic direction of the armed forces to the government of the day. So if Royal Air Force crews are involved in the bombing of another country, they are doing it under the orders of the government. No ifs, no buts, they are following the direct orders of the Secretary of State for Defence, because it is that person who directs the Chief of the Defence Staff (currently Nick Houghton).

The problem is that the UK parliament voted against action in Syria. So why are our armed forces currently engaged there? Obviously the government has disregarded the democratic wishes of the House of Commons and decided to bomb Syria anyway. There can be no other explanation.

There is a name which describes the act of a government which disregards the democratic wishes of the people’s elected representatives, that name is dictatorship. Is that where we are at? While we wish our armed forces all the best, are they acting illegally? We really need to know.

RAF ensign

RAF ensign

What about us?

The EVELs of fox hunting

The prime minister has been forced to withdraw the vote to relax the law on the abhorrent blood “sport” of fox-hunting in England and Wales over fears that his government would be defeated due to the 56 SNP MPs’ declaration that they would vote against the government. But the vote hasn’t gone away, it is merely postponed until the tories rig the voting system in the UK parliament and turn Scotland’s MPs into second class ones with their EVEL plans.

The whole of the right-wing establishment were convulsing with rage. UKIP deputy leader, Paul Nuttall MEP said, “We should throw Sturgeon in front of a hunt horse for Pankhurst day.” Now when the deputy leader of a political party issues death threats against the leader of another political party you would expect that to be news wouldn’t you? Of course you wouldn’t, because you know that the right-wing media of the UK, including the BBC, only tell the SNP bad narrative. But let one pro-independence Twitter user say a bad word and we would have the whole media circus calling for heads to roll.

The story was presented from another angle by the MSM, giving it the usual SNP bad spin. Take this piece from the billionaire Barclay brothers owned Daily Telegraph –

David Cameron ‘must strengthen Evel plans to stop SNP maintaining ban on hunting in England’

The current proposals for EVEL would still allow the SNP to thwart the government because of the “double majority” which would be required to pass such laws. Now the prime minister will be forced to amend the EVEL proposals due to pressure from his blood thirsty back benchers who love to watch animals being ripped to pieces by a pack of dogs. Liam Fox MP even said, ” if the SNP were allowed to vote on English hunting legislation then it would not be worth proceeding.” Get that, he wants the SNP to be banned from voting in the UK parliament altogether! I’m sure that we can expect the EVEL proposals to be made much more restrictive, thus driving a stake into the very heart of the union. Just as the SNP envisioned.

I believe that the SNP were right to say that they would vote against this relaxation of the fox-hunting law. It shows that they are engaging in the politics of the UK, as they were elected to do. I’m sure that their stock will have risen amongst the vast majority of the UK population over this principled stance. What they need to do now is to continue in the same vein and ban all blood sports in Scotland. The idea that rich people will be paying to come here on the “glorious twelfth” to blast the crap out of our native wildlife sickens me. Let’s keep this ball rolling.