Category Archives: Scotland

Racist Sign

The vilification of Scotland

The dictionary defines vilification as: “To attack the reputation of (a person or thing) with strong or abusive criticism.” To my mind this is exactly what we have been seeing in the press over the last week or more.

We had Steve Bell’s racist slur cartoon in the Guardian, suggesting that all Scots are incestuous. I won’t bother showing it here. There was much derision at the Scottish outrage with “It’s just a cartoon” being the most common refrain. Yes it was a cartoon, but one carefully calculated to denigrate the Scots.

We also had Alan Massie give us a “Rivers of Blood” monologue in the Daily Heil (English Edition only). To quote him, “To borrow the Roman poet Virgil’s phrase (but intending none of the racist malice Enoch Powell so famously lent it), I don’t say the rivers Thames and Mersey will literally foam with blood – but they might well do so metaphorically.” He may not have intended the racist malice, but the whole piece leans towards it. It stokes anti Scottish hatred just because we may decide to vote for a party which he, and the rest of the Imperial Masters, does not approve of.

Then we had The Sun (English edition) giving our First Minister the Miley Cyrus makeover, portraying her on a wrecking ball wearing nought but a skimpy tartan bikini. The sexism is breathtaking. The picture harks back to the golden age of The Sun. I am reminded of when they covered the Hillsborough Disaster.

The Sun's Front Page after Hillsborough Disaster

The Sun’s Front Page after Hillsborough Disaster

We also had the Tory mock-up of Ed Miliband in the breast pocket of Alex Salmond. At least this one had a point other that to stoke hatred of the Scots. I could go on, that lot is from one week after all. So what’s it all about?

FEAR, that’s what it’s all about. Setting the SNP up as the big bogeyman. Trying to to achieve a number of points:

  1. Scaring the voters away from voting Labour on the off-chance that they may end up in some form of coalition with the SNP in the event of a hung parliament.
  2. Manoeuvering the English electorate into accepting the reasons for EVEL.
  3. Make the Scots appear to be a bunch of ungrateful oiks who are worthy only of derision, ergo their democratically elected representatives (who will be either SNP or Labour) will be unfit for high office.
  4. Working up some English nationalist fervour (shhh, we’re not allowed to call it that) in an effort to counter the rise of UKIP.

The problem with these strategies is that they will inevitably create a backlash against the Scots. We had all the sweet cooing noises during the independence referendum, but now we’re getting the hot tongue and cold shoulder. I fear that it won’t be long before we see signs like these:

Racist Sign

Racist Sign

Gas Distribution Networks UK

It’s a gas, gas, gas.

After the furore over the future of the Longannet power station, where the coal-fired generator has to pay £40 million per annum just to connect to the grid, I decided to do a bit more digging into the energy sector of the UK. What I found doesn’t surprise me but it does sadden me. For here we are living in a land rich in natural resources. We have an abundance of energy sources yet we pay the highest prices for our energy in the whole UK. Which is bizarre when you consider that we produce so much of the stuff.

I happened upon a report from Consumer Focus which caught my eye. It is entitled, “Off-gas consumers” and it details the numbers of people who are connected to the mains gas grid in the UK. But before we get into the report it is worth reminding ourselves where the UK’s natural gas comes from, for this we can get the information from the DECC in their DUKES report.

UK gas network

UK gas network

Reading through the DUKES report we can see that the UK is no longer self-sufficient in natural gas, we produce around 50% of what we consume. The rest is imported and the bulk of that comes through the Langeled interconnection from Norway. But if we look at the home produced stuff we can see that the vast majority of it comes from the North Sea. There is an area off East Anglia which produces a lot of gas and very little oil but all of the rest comes from Scottish waters and it is landed at St. Fergus gas terminal near the Broch. Just up the road from me. From there the gas enters the UK’s gas transmission system and travels through 4 pipelines which transport the gas south, all the way south. All of those pipelines pass close to my house, one of them is less than 400m away, yet I have no mains gas.

Which brings us back to the Consumer Focus report, here is a nice wee table which illustrates the costs of different heating fuels:

Fuel costs for heating

Fuel costs for heating

Although the table states 2009 prices it was updated in 2013, but since the fall in the price of oil we can assume that the figures are no longer valid. However the point of the table is to illustrate the costs of each fuel for heating our homes. As we can see, mains gas is the cheapest and electric heating can be almost three times more expensive. Here in Gordon I use heating oil and logs. Cheapish but not as cheap as mains gas.

But I’m not alone in the lack of mains gas, there are others.

Mains gas connections UK

Mains gas connections UK

We can see that in England 92.8% of households have access to mains gas. But the picture here in Scotland is not so rosy, up here we only have 86.4% of our households with access to mains gas. Of those without mains gas access 15.2% of the households use the most expensive fuel type, electricity. As the Consumer Focus report describes, a lack of access to mains gas creates fuel poverty. So how can it be that we produce so much natural gas yet we have so small a distribution network?

Part of the answer is that we have a larger rural population scattered over a larger area than England, but that’s not all of the answer. Methlick is a village not far from me and it has a population of 442 at the last census, yet it has no mains gas. There are countless other small villages dotted about the countryside which are also deficient of a mains gas supply. So who or what is responsible?

Gas Distribution Networks UK

Gas Distribution Networks UK

The distribution of mains gas in Scotland is controlled by a single company which is now called SGN, some might call that a monopoly. SGN is owned by three shareholders: Borealis Infrastructure Europe (UK) Ltd (25%), Ontario Teachers Pension Plan Board (25%) and Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE) Ltd (50%). SGN also distribute gas in southern England. SSE has some directors on SGN’s board. SSE also produce electricity, and as we have seen we have the most expensive electricity in the country.

If you have dual fuel, that is both gas and electricity, you can save money by purchasing both from the same supplier. Lets take a look at what a customer in Inverness would pay Eon for dual fuel at the standard rate:

Dual fuel Inverness Eon

Dual fuel Inverness Eon

Now lets take a look at what a customer in Ilford would pay for the same package:

Dual fuel Ilford Eon

Dual fuel Ilford Eon

We can see from the above that the electricity is more expensive in Scotland but the gas price is exactly the same. We discussed the extra cost that Scotland pays for electricity in this post. The normal reason given is that we are so remote from the generators that the transmission costs are higher, also our generators pay more to connect to the national grid because they are remote from the main population centres (hence the £40 million connection charge for Longannet).

By the same logic surely we should see the same thing for gas: the further away from the supply you are the more you would pay since there are losses in the gas network also? However this is not the case. A customer in London can buy gas from the Scottish sector of the North Sea for the same price that a customer who lives right next door to where that gas comes ashore pays. What kind of twisted logic is this? Is this a case of Scotland subsidising the rest of UK again?

But that is not all, lets take a look at where some of this gas ends up; power stations. The most efficient, and cleanest, form of power generation from fossil fuels is currently the Combined Cycle Gas Turbine power station. With such an abundance of gas you expect that Scotland would have a few of these? Eh no, we have one at Peterhead and the old Cockenzie coal-fired station is due for conversion at some point.

So if we don’t have them who does? Well if we have a look at this list from Wikipedia we can see that England has 45 of them, all of them being built since 1991. Coincidentally this is just after the privatisation of British Gas in 1986. Perhaps that explains why there are no extra transmission costs for gas? Or am I just being overly cynical?

Longannet is back in the news today with the announcement that it may have to close next year due to the high connection charges. The UK government, who have energy as a reserved matter, say that they will look at the pricing structure for electricity transmission in 2016. They also say that Scotland’s energy supply is assured due to the pooling and sharing of resources and all those lovely CCGT power stations daan saarf will keep the lights on.

The problem is that we will have to pay more for this electricity, which is produced from Scottish gas in England, to be sent from England back to Scotland, due to transmissionlosses. Logical it is not.

Is this a case of the UK government deliberately running the Scottish industries and infrastructure down in order for us to be more dependant upon rUK and therefore less likely to become independent? Therein lies the question.

COSCA Cow Milked by Clan Chiefs

Milking the COSCA cow

COSCA, or the Council of Scottish Clans & Associations, are an American organisation who aim to put people in touch with their ancestry. They also wish to keep the clan system, as they see it, alive. They cannot understand that we that are left here in Scotland, the “also rans” as Alastair McIntyre arrogantly states in his comment, don’t bother with our clans. The clan system to which they subscribe is one of their own, and Walter Scott’s, making. It is still fundamentally feudal in nature however, with its inherited chieftainship. It is this aspect of the clan system which we find abhorrent. Why should anybody be placed in a position of power and privilege just because of who their parents were?

The clan chiefs have their own website and club, called the Standing Council of Scottish Chiefs or the Scottish Feudal Council as we like to call them. It is this organisation which wishes to perpetuate the feudalism of the past. Have a look at the list of chiefs, it reads like a who’s who of the Scottish landed gentry. Of the 120 persons listed fully half are titled. People such as the Countess of Sutherland and the Earl of Caithness, whose ancestors were among the worst of the clan chiefs who cleared the lands of their people. Their own kin! It is these actions which make the highlands of Scotland look as they do today, empty. Full of ruins, testament to the chiefs’ savagery of the past.

These chiefs are the same people who are currently squealing about the upcoming Land Reform bill. COSCA have also noticed this bill, if they wish to know more about the issues surrounding land reform they could pop over to Andy Wightman’s site or read his book, The Poor Had No Lawyers. It is an issue which we feel strongly about too and there will be posts about this subject soon. Don’t forget that the land which these chiefs own once belonged to the people of the clan, you may wish to ask your landed clan chief how they came to be in possession of it.

Scottish Republican Socialist Movement

To a louse (and engaging with the diaspora)

It’s good to talk, as they say, and I’m enjoying the engagement that we’re getting from the Scottish diaspora as well as from various knights and peers of the realm. As regular readers will know we have been engaging with COSCA over the course of a couple of posts here and here. They have written a nice reply which you can see here.

It is clear from their repeated posts that they have no idea of what it means to be Scottish today. They believe that we are all aligned with our respective clans, yet the betrayal of the people by the clan chiefs ensured that the clan system was dismantled for ever. We that are left in Scotland, the “also rans” as Alistair says in his comment, couldn’t care less about our clans. Yes we know which ones we “belong” to but otherwise we really couldn’t care less. For instance I am clan Gunn, an internet search can provide the chief’s name but I really don’t care who it is. I owe him no allegiance.

Malcolm MacGregor, who likes to inform us that he has knelt before the queen, hits the nail on the head in his comment: “400 attending a clan convention,” the current population of Scotland is approximately 5.29 million so that’s a whole 0.0075% of the population. That’s how much we care about our clans. But our apathy has forced the current chiefs to look elsewhere for support, that’s why they head for the diaspora. The next thing you know they’ll be trying to solicit donations to preserve their crumbling seats.

I have no problem with the diaspora and their heritage, it is a shared heritage after all. But to be fawning over some person because they are the clan chief sickens me in the same way that someone using some ancient feudal title, such as baron, sickens me. For it is the monarchy, and by extension the peerage, which is the root of all corruption in this country. The good folks of USA managed to throw off the yoke of the monarchy in 1783, we are still inflicted by it.

As Alistair points out, Scotland today is “a pale shadow of what it was,” but that is deliberate. It has been the policy of the UK government to bleed Scotland and redistribute the money to England for centuries. It has also been their policy to try to destroy the Scottish culture. For instance the entirety of Scottish history which was taught to me at school was Culloden. Everything else was English history. That is what we wanted to change, what we hoped that we would change, during the referendum.

If you receive your world view from our media then it is inevitably biased against us, that is why we started this blog. You will find that almost all media outlets are against Scottish independence. They are almost all against the SNP, yet the majority of the Scottish people still voted for them and they will probably be the largest Scottish party at Westminster after the May general election. Why do you suppose that is?

It is because we want a fairer society for ourselves and our children. A society that is free of barons and knights, kings and queens. A society which would rather spend £100 billion on improving the lives of the people than weapons of mass destruction. We may have lost the battle, it was like our Dunkirk. We are regrouping and we shall venture once more into the fray. In the famous words of Churchill, “we shall never surrender.”

As for giving the bard bad press, how do you work that out? He provides me with some of my best inspiration:

O wad some Power the giftie gie us
To see oursels as ithers see us!
It wad frae mony a blunder free us,
An’ foolish notion:
What airs in dress an’ gait wad lea’e us,
An’ev’n devotion!

Scottish Republican Socialist Movement

Scottish Republican Socialist Movement