Category Archives: Scotland

Why does Scotland pay more for electricity?

It will probably come as no surprise that here in Scotland we have to pay more for our electricity than our cousins in England. Meanwhile the electricity companies who provide us with this electricity make heavy profits. Does this seem fair? No I don’t think so although you may have a different opinion. But how does this come to pass? Why do we pay more and how much more?

Well the following picture illustrates the cost of electricity bought from SSE/Scottish Hydro for a property in Aberdeenshire:

Electricity Costs Aberdeenshire

Electricity Costs Aberdeenshire

So you can see that the Tariff Comparison Rate (TCR) is 17.29 pence per unit (kWh). So for a property which uses 4000 units per annum the cost would be £691.60. So what about our cousins down south? Well the following table illustrates the costs of electricity bought from SSE/Scottish Hydro for a property in Southampton:

Electricity Costs Dingwall

Electricity Costs Southampton

As you can see the TCR for this property is 15.73 pence per unit which is 1.56 pence less than the Aberdeenshire property. So for our 4000 kWh user the bill would be £629.20 per annum. Which means that our Southampton property would pay £62.40 less than our Aberdeenshire property for their annual electricity. So our Aberdeenshire property pays almost 10% more than our Southampton property.

Here in Scotland we are having a renewable energy boom, which is mostly driven by Government subsidies, but it is to be welcomed none the less. Renewable energy has exceeded our demand for electricity on a few occasions recently and our carbon emissions have been drastically cut. Most of this boom in renewable energy is being driven by wind turbines, but we also have some biomass and solar in the mix too. In order to get the energy being generated to a customer the generator needs to be connected to the electricity grid, but this costs money as you would expect. But how much? The following table shows how much it costs to connect a generator to the grid across the UK:

Generator Connection Charges UK

Generator Connection Charges UK

As you can see, if you want to connect a generator to the grid in Scotland you will pay much more than you would if you were located in England or Wales. In some areas of England they will pay you to connect your generator to the grid. Here is another picture which illustrates the difference in generator connection charges:

Generator Connection Charges UK

Generator Connection Charges UK

The reasons given for these discrepancies are “a combination of a locational element that reflects the cost of providing incremental capacity to generation on an area of the main integrated onshore transmission system, and a non-locational residual element which ensures that the appropriate amount of transmission revenue is recovered from generators.” In other words it costs more to get the power from remote areas to the main users in built up areas.

The reality is that we in Scotland subsidise the rest of the UK, we pay more for the electricity we use and we pay more for the getting the power that we produce onto the grid. These extra costs are holding back our renewable energy sector and punishing the people with higher electricity charges.

So what can be done? We could re-nationalise the electricity grid. Then we could ensure that the transmission charges are the same no matter where you live or generate and then I could be paying the same for my electricity as someone in Southampton. Are there any bold politicians out there who would make this their policy?

Fat Tory Alex Johnston MSP

Fat Tory does not recognise referendum result!

Alex Johnston MSP (Conservative list for NE Scotland) does not recognise the Scottish referendum result, he voted against the motion “That the Parliament recognises the result of the independence referendum.” So what does that mean? Does it mean that he wanted independence? Not likely. Does it mean that he believes that the referendum was rigged and that it was not free and fair? Probably.

Why have I picked this particular fat tory for today’s blog I hear you ask? Well it’s because he decided to give his tuppence worth today on the BBC about the nomination of Nicola Sturgeon as leader of the SNP. For the record he said,”We all know how keen the SNP leadership were on keeping the monarchy and that seems to extend to adopting a similar succession model for their new leader.” That’s how elections work Alex, if there is only one candidate then there is not much point in having an election is there? Alex has never won an election, he got his seat as a list MSP.

Just for the record Alex Johnston opposed gay marriage but supported the bedroom tax. He’s a typical fat tory with his snout in the trough.

Lord Smith of Kelvin

The Smith Commission

The Smith Commission was set up in the aftermath of the Scottish independence referendum in an effort to fulfil the promises of the no campaign who had been panicked into making the promises of more power to the Scottish Parliament by the narrowing of the opinion polls. The commission has a very tight timeline to consider which powers should be devolved, courtesy of Gordie Broon’s ‘timetable’. The aim of the commission is to get representatives of all of the main political parties together and somehow get them to agree to a set of proposals by 31st October. Not long to consider the constitutional future of a country you may think, and I would have to agree with you especially since nothing has happened yet except for the naming of (almost) all of the representatives.

The representatives are:

SNP

John Swinney and Linda Fabiani

Greens

Patrick Harvie and Maggie Chapman

Scottish Labour

Iain Gray and (probably) Gregg McClymont

Scottish Conservative

Annabel Goldie and Adam Tomkins

Lib Dem

Michael Moore and Tavish Scott

The astute reader will have already spotted a problem with this set up. There are 4 pro independence representatives and 6 unionist representatives. So we have 40% of the participants representing the pro-independence movement and 60% of the participants representing the unionist side. Not exactly representative of the referendum outcome is it? The commission already smacks of bias to me, how about you?

Lord Smith of Kelvin

Lord Smith of Kelvin

Another potential problem is Baron Smith of Kelvin who’s bum creases the red leather cross party benches in the unelected House of Lords when he can be bothered to turn up. He has knelt before the queen twice, once for a plain knighthood and again for a knighthood into the order of the thistle. He’s about as establishment as you get. Robert Haldane Smith, to give him his mortal name, is also the chairman of Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE) who were fined £1.25 million in 2012 for sharp doorstep selling practices and another £10.5 million in 2013 for “prolonged and extensive” miss-selling. He is also a non executive director of Standard Bank Group (which was fined more than £6 million for breaching money laundering regulations in 2014). So as we can see he has vested interests in the energy sector and financial services. He is attributed with no political party affiliation but he owes his loyalty to the queen who “purred” when she heard the result of the referendum. But lets be kind to him and call him neutral, until we learn otherwise,

The commission’s terms of reference are, “to convene cross-party talks and facilitate an inclusive engagement process across Scotland to produce, by 30 November 2014, Heads of Agreement with recommendations for further devolution of powers to the Scottish Parliament. This process will be informed by a Command Paper, to be published by 31 October and will result in the publication of draft clauses by 25 January. The recommendations will deliver more financial, welfare and taxation powers, strengthening the Scottish Parliament within the United Kingdom.”

The commission is welcoming proposals from everyone, for details of how you can submit your ideas click here.

I, for one, hope that something meaningful comes from this commission. We shall have to wait and see. However it is then up to Westminster to legislate and GIVE us those powers, and with a general election just round the corner, I can’t help but feel that the issue is going to be kicked into the long grass. When it finally resurfaces it will end up being watered down so that we end up with a wee sweetie to sook on.

Some of things that I would like to see are the devolution of income tax, national insurance, corporation tax, energy policy, welfare, pensions, land policy, air passenger duty, fuel duty, alcohol duty and last but not least the constitution because as things stand what Westminster gives they can also take away. Will we get to see any of these things? I doubt it because I don’t trust the Westminster establishment. But I’ll try anyway. Maybe you should have a wee think and come up with your own ideas, don’t forget the deadline of 31st October to get them in.